Live deliberately

by Julie on March 11, 2010

It’s hard to comfort a child who’s asking tough questions about death when I haven’t yet arrived at an explanation that’s comforting to me.

I’m not sure when I first became conscious of my own mortality and that of my parents and grandparents – the people I loved most as a child. I do clearly remember a conversation with my father in which he asked, “Do you know what it was like before you were born? No, right? You won’t know what it’s like after you’re dead.”

As harsh as that may sound, it was the most comforting explanation I ever received. Without knowing about that conversation between my father and me, my husband gave an uncannily similar explanation to our oldest daughter when she quizzed him on the topic.

She’s contemplative by nature – a logical thinker who absorbs information, draws conclusions, and asks more questions. It’s fun to talk with her about subjects most second-graders would find boring. But her inquisitiveness – combined with our atheism – makes discussions of a spiritual nature difficult.

Telling her “when you die, you cease to exist in any form – you can’t see or talk or think or move” feels like I’m ripping the veil off Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny all at once. Childhood’s over, kid!

But on the other hand, I don’t want to lie to her on a serious subject. I’ll tell her the truth about sex and drugs and all the times I disobeyed my parents; it’s only fair for me to be honest with her about what I believe.

When my grandmother died, it was my daughter’s first experience with the death of someone she knew personally and loved very much. I explained that Granny’s body had worn out – that her heart couldn’t keep beating, so all of her body parts stopped working. I told her that this is what happens when people get old, and that Granny had lived for a long, long time. I told her that Granny knew how much we all loved her and that we’d never forget her.

As contemplative and inquisitive as she is, our explanations have sufficed for our daughter – so far. The problem, as I see it, is that if she grows dissatisfied with them, we don’t have any other comforting words to offer her. Being nonbelievers, we can’t convince her of something we don’t believe. She can choose to adopt other beliefs that better meet her emotional needs, but neither my husband nor I can encourage that in good conscience any more than a devoutly religious parent could encourage a child to abandon faith.

I wish I could tell her differently. I wish I could believe that I will see my grandmother again – that I will see all of my grandparents, my uncle, my friend Kirsten, even our beloved pets. I wish I could believe that my friends will be reunited with their own families, especially the siblings and children they lost far too soon. I wish I could believe that this world wasn’t all we’ve got.

But wishing won’t make it so. I cannot believe any of that.

What I can do is encourage her to make the most of every day – work hard, play hard, and love the people who are important to her with all her might. To enjoy what she’s got while she’s got it, because it may change – for better or worse – at any moment. To live out the famous quote from Henry David Thoreau (figuratively, if not literally):

“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.”

And so for me – and hopefully for my children as well – the question becomes not “What happens when we die?” but “How do we want to live?”

My grandmother would have been ninety-four this Saturday, yet my grief is still fresh. As many tissues as I went through writing this post, I’m honored to be writing in the company of Catherine, Devra, Lindsay, and Loralee on the topic of explaining death to children. The five of us have different religious/spiritual views, but we’re also friends who respect and admire one another, which makes the exchange of ideas between us both civil and enlightening.

You may agree with one of us. Or none of us. Or all of us, to one degree or another. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this topic, whatever they may be.

Speak Up!

Another reason to delay family air travel

by Julie on March 9, 2010

It’s been almost a year since our last airline trip as a family, and it will probably be at least another year before we attempt it again.

With our extended families spread from coast to coast, we’ve traveled by plane frequently over the years to pay visits, often with children in tow. Although I put my foot down once I was pregnant with our second child – no more traveling during the holiday season – my husband and I and all three of our kids have logged plenty of miles in the sky. We’ve also logged quite a few hours on the ground, thanks to delays.

But the new Department of Transportation rule limiting delays to three hours probably won’t convince us to give air travel another go sooner than planned:

“The heart of the regulations deals with extended tarmac delays and mandates that passengers on domestic flights be allowed to disembark after three hours (provided doing so doesn’t create a safety or security issue or interfere with airport operations).”

While I certainly appreciate that we wouldn’t be stuck on board an aircraft going nowhere for more than three hours, I expect the passengers seated anywhere near my family and me would want to be rid of us in the first 30 minutes. Getting kids to sit still with the aid of a lap belt and the promise of a Disneyland destination is difficult enough; it’s downright impossible when there’s no estimated time of departure in sight, let alone an arrival time.

People hate being seated near families on airplanes. I’ve gotten nasty looks long before we boarded (and been the target of many more once we settled into our row). Three kids later, my skin has thickened such that I don’t mind the looks. I’m too busy keeping my kids occupied to be concerned with how my fellow passengers are enjoying their flight or coping with an extended delay on the tarmac.

According to MSNBC.com travel writer Rob Lovitt, the trade-off that may come with this new rule is that cancellations may increase. He quotes an airline industry consultant who posits that “we’ll probably see an enormous number of cancellations” as airlines seek to avoid fines for delays that bust the three-hour limit.

What’s worse – an extended delay or an outright cancellation? Lovitt writes: “the comparative inconvenience of being stuck on a plane for several hours versus delayed for a day or more will always be in the eye of the beholder.”

Delays are awful. Being crammed into a small space, often without food or drinks available, and sharing a tiny lavatory with several dozen other travelers is no way to spend a vacation or a business trip.

But it’s been cancellations, not delays, that have caused us the greatest headaches. A cancellation is especially inconvenient for our family because we need five seats, as opposed to just one for a business traveler. An overnight cancellation is difficult enough for one person or a couple (it’s happened to me on business travel and to my husband and me en route to our honeymoon destination); I’d probably rather spend the night on the plane with my kids than face the logistical nightmare of getting ourselves and our luggage to a hotel.

The most harrowing airline experience we’ve had was on our last trip. We flew without event from Denver to Orange County. But our return flight was canceled. The only available return flight was from Burbank, but our car rental company didn’t have a Burbank location. So we drove from Anaheim to LAX to return our car and took a SuperShuttle from LAX to Burbank. In light the associated inconvenience and expense – all borne by us, not by the airline or the car rental company – I would have much rather sat on the tarmac. At least there I could have relaxed with a glass plastic cup of wine.

Therefore, given the potential for this well-intentioned new rule to cause more cancellations, I’ll accept it as a sign that our family should continue to delay our next plane trip.

Delay or cancellation – which one gives you a bigger headache?

6 Spoke Up